Originally Posted by
WCroadie
Read the whole article, that's why I linked it. Just look at the times of the rides up the mountain, those are facts are they not? All those top ascents done by riders admittedly doped to the gills yet the wonderful Mr Froome who is clean beats most. Sorry it's just not possible.
On a non-specific standpoint, why isn't it possible? In all sports records are broken all the time, why would cycling be different?
Originally Posted by
WCroadie
Another reason why I can't stand sky/Froome is because all of his blind love followers, reminds me of all those who wore the yellow bracelets of their clean hero who also disregarded the facts.
Who are these blind love followers? Don't think I have seen any of them in here.
Originally Posted by
WCroadie
For years now pro cycling has been a dirty sport and just about every winner of the tour has been busted or admitted to using dope, yet we should believe that now, the team/rider totally dominating 3 out of the last 4 tours, and the one they didn't win because Mr Wonderful crashed out was won by a team and a rider known for doping allegations yet sky and Froome are clean. That is comical.
'Allegations.' Also, if every winner has been busted or admitted using dope, wouldn't that say that the system works, therefore you should trust it and if Froome is indeed cheating, it will come out eventually?
Originally Posted by
WCroadie
Oh yeah, you know all those monstrous football players running insane 40 yard dash times and jumping higher that ever and hitting harder than ever, they aren't using steroids of HGH either, you know how I know? Cause they never failed a drug test so they must be clean right? Even if what they do isn't natural.
What is not 'natural' about it? Do you have any proof beyond 'they are better than I think they should be.'