Old 08-03-15, 06:20 AM
  #23  
chaadster
Thread Killer
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 12,539

Bikes: 15 Kinesis Racelight 4S, 76 Motebecane Gran Jubilée, 17 Dedacciai Gladiatore2, 12 Breezer Venturi, 09 Dahon Mariner, 12 Mercier Nano, 95 DeKerf Team SL, 19 Tern Rally, 21 Breezer Doppler Cafe+, 19 T-Lab X3, 91 Serotta CII, 23 3T Strada

Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3226 Post(s)
Liked 1,778 Times in 1,073 Posts
Originally Posted by volosong
One of my bikes is a 2010 model and its tube shapes and geometry are very aerodynamic. Manufactured long before the current marketing fad... I didn't purchase it because of its aero characteristics, (who even knew about that stuff back then), but because it was a very good price point for the component group it had. (I've since moved the groupset to another bike, which is my favorite and most comfortable ride.)
I wouldn't call it a fad, as aero has been a key word in road cycling since the late '80s, and the application of aero has been on an inexorable march forward ever since.

Everything, from wheels to handlebars to cable routing to seatposts, cranks, and pedals has undergone aero scrutiny...and it started waaaayyy before 2010!
chaadster is offline