Old 08-04-15, 09:35 AM
  #7414  
nemeseri
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 465

Bikes: Trek Emonda SL build, CAAD10, Bianchi Pista '13, Litespeed Antares '03

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 52 Post(s)
Liked 4 Times in 1 Post
Originally Posted by shovelhd
If you could go 100% for 17 minutes and ride another 60 miles, you didn't go 100%. Probably not even 90%. If you have never raced, your RPE meter isn't calibrated for racing, where going 100% is mandatory but has to be managed. This will come with time and experience. I will also say that doing a test on flat ground is harder than on a steady grade. The hill provides an erg type effect that flat ground doesn't. It's harder to maintain steady power as the flat road undulates.

Do your test. In the meantime go ahead and set up your zones using your ride data. If you start doing intervals and you are not challenged to complete them, then bump the zone up until the test. If you are challenged by your intervals then you are in the ballpark.
I really hope you are right, since the climb wattage was far-far better than expected.
(BTW I cramped 20 min later after the rest and suffered badly during the remaining 60 miles. YES, it was a dumb idea.)
Last thing: do you guys have a different power zones for hills? Do you learn to process the same wattage on flat? How do you handle this issue? Do you simply test on climbs? Put it differently: what is better? Over or underestimate slightly?
nemeseri is offline