Originally Posted by
PatrickGSR94
How does one fight an obvious RLJ to which he has already admitted to committing here in this thread? What would be the point of trying? To insult the judge's intelligence?
I have found that Judges don't really care what is right, wrong, or appropriate.
However, if the light is on a switch, and there is no reasonable way to reliably trigger the switch, and no cars sitting on the switch, then one might be able to fight the citation. Especially after ascertaining there is no cross traffic.
Also, one could argue that T-intersections into bike lanes, or perhaps right turns into bike lanes operate independent of traffic flow.