View Single Post
Old 08-17-15, 06:07 PM
  #65  
Willbird
Senior Member
 
Willbird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Very N and Very W Ohio Williams Co.
Posts: 2,458

Bikes: 2001 Trek Multitrack 7200, 2104 Fuji Sportif 1.5

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by 79pmooney
It isn't the fructose or the glucose that is the issue. It is that the human body has never seen that particular chemical formulation (high fructose corn sugar) before. The problem comes when ask the body to process chemicals that are just enough different that the tools the body has don't quite work. Or we ask the body to deal with chemicals it has seen before but never in amounts to matter. (Sucrose. Where in nature can a human find a source of sucrose to get an ounce of it for a sugar high! That little drop of nectar at the base of flowers that hummingbirds get so readily? That would take a lot of flowers. Sap, like sugar maple sap that we make maple sugar from? At 1/40th the sugar of maple syrup, we'd get pretty sick drinking enough for that sugar high. We could eat sugar beets. Chew on cane sugar. Caribbean kids have been chewing on cane sugar for probably millennia. The sugar is so dilute that they had none of the sugar issues we see now.)

Ben
+1.

IMHO Fructose in fruit where it comes with fiber and the whole package is nothing like HFCS. When I was type II I checked all kinds of foods to see what they did to my blood sugar........pineapple even packed in juice would spike my sugar like crazy, but non citrus fruits and berries did not even cause a blip.
Willbird is offline