Originally Posted by
Biker395
Not to my knowledge.
I consider it to the drone owner to be guilty of peeping tom by proxy. They can sue me for the drone ... I'll countersue for the trespass and invasion of privacy, and well see what a jury says. I know which side I'd rather be on.
Federal law says it isn't trespassing. You don't own the airspace above your property. That's why you can't sue Channel 5 news for flying their helicopter over your property either. Perhaps you think that you can sue someone and just make up whatever you want the law to be and think a jury will believe that but that's not how it works.
Since it's happened multiple times that someone has knocked down a drone, and the
person who attacked the drone is the one arrested and subject to civil liability, and the
drone operator is not arrested or charged with any of your made-up laws, I think you'll find the police only too happy to correct you on which side of the jail cell bars you are on.