Originally Posted by
Biker395
I asked for a reference indicating that the FAA ruled that it was legal to fly drones over private property at below, say ... 350 feet.
You provided a opinion article from a lawyer who said that the CA legislation would pass muster with FAA regulations if it limited it's application to altitudes below 350 feet.
The CA legislation regarding trespassing applies only to drones flying at altitudes under 350 feet.
It looks as if you provided a reference that refutes (A), (B) and (C) ... What am I missing here?
My mistake...the bill was obviously changed since the publication of the article (and when I first read it) to incorporate the language which eliminates the flaw that Gregory McNeal pointed out.
That said, he does a better job than me in this article and others of his he links to of outlining how, absent a law like California's new one, drones are legally permitted to fly over private property.