Old 09-12-15, 02:59 AM
  #65  
chasm54
Banned.
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Uncertain
Posts: 8,651
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Machka
The "why" is this ... the assumption is that just because a person is slow, they are also unable to cover distance....

I'm a slow cyclist ... and I'm OK with that. But I can cover the distance. As long as I can maintain the randonneuring 15 km/h minimum, that's all I need.
Well, OK. But I don't think it is unreasonable to assume that most of the people riding slowly will be beginners, or compromised through age or whatever, and therefore unlikely to be up for a 50 mile ride. Quite apart from anything else, a 50 mile ride at 15kph is going to take over five hours, and most clubs aren't going to find a group that wants to ride for that long at that pace.

Of course, as a randonneur, distance is your thing. But randonneuring doesn't readily lend itself to club runs, it is almost by definition more of a solitary/small group affair.
chasm54 is offline