Old 09-30-15 | 03:26 PM
  #8  
Craptacular8's Avatar
Craptacular8
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 652
Likes: 41
Originally Posted by corrado33
Hm, now I'm even more confused... I went to the only bike shop in town that actually stocks Surlys and I rode a 58 cross check (only size they had in stock.) It was certainly too big, but was it two sizes too big? I'm not sure. I wasn't bent over too far, heck I was bent over less than on my Motobecane, even though the bike had a massive stem on it. (Must have been at least a 120-130mm stem.)

They offered to order me a 56 to see if it's the right size, but I have absolutely no intention of buying the bike from them, so I can't ask them to do that. They also couldn't really identify the size of the frame very well. He first told me it was a 56, then 58, and at one point a 60cm! I don't think it was a 60cm as the standover height would be larger than my inseam, and I could stand over this bike just fine. I could even lift the wheels a few cm off of the ground simultaneously. The bike didn't feel "un-ride-ably" large, however there were a few quirks when I was riding it. One was that when I was out of the saddle the bike was very unstable. Much less stable than my 56cm Motobecane. The saddle was probably 1 cm too high for me, but it was still a good 12cm out of the seat tube. (By no means slammed.)

I'm just thrown off because the bike didn't SEEM large. It seemed... only slightly too big.
The longer stem SHOULD shorten the effective reach and make you have a more upright posture, that's why many folks do set the bars higher, to get more upright. Going to a slightly larger frame can allow you to more easily get the saddle lower than the bars/even with the bars, without needing to have a really long stem. Depends on the type of fit you're looking for, and purpose.
Craptacular8 is offline  
Reply