Old 10-06-15 | 12:20 PM
  #63  
boomhauer's Avatar
boomhauer
Senior Member
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 786
Likes: 48
Originally Posted by McBTC
Nope, I don't have a problem. I'm not even talking about homelessness as an economic problem that has resulted in a loss of housing. However, you may be onto something when you talk about, goals. Having or not having a goal is perhaps something I am talking about without even realizing it.

The "bike" element comes into the discussion primarily because I am looking at those with a bike and no home and my observation that there seems to be more bums these days in the Cal-coastal cities that are popular among tourists and inarguably would be a nice place to live albeit expensive (ever seen the prices for a small old house in Carmel?).

For some, however, their home is much like a bike being the temporary home of a bicycle tourist. With a love of cycling and some experience touring over the years, my curiosity goes to the point of wondering if adding the element of a bike, just might in some way change the dynamic of homelessness... for the better -- e.g., change the way a homeless person (presumably someone in need) thinks -- which, obviously is not just about a lack of housing.

Wouldn't you like to think that simply giving a homeless person a bike would change their lives for the better? Unfortunately, that's probably all it is: a nice thought.
I've met some people, the kind you describe, living on their bike as a temporary measure. They are usually young, full of life, but homeless none the less. You are making a BIG presumption that the people you see are in need.

Look at it this way.....the country is full of public lands (Parks, National Forests, etc...) that has been paid for with tax money.
Why not make use of it? That's what I would be doing if I was homeless around Carmel, CA.
boomhauer is offline