View Single Post
Old 10-08-15, 01:23 PM
  #45  
noglider 
aka Tom Reingold
 
noglider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: New York, NY, and High Falls, NY, USA
Posts: 40,509

Bikes: 1962 Rudge Sports, 1971 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Raleigh Pro Track, 1974 Raleigh International, 1975 Viscount Fixie, 1982 McLean, 1996 Lemond (Ti), 2002 Burley Zydeco tandem

Mentioned: 511 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7354 Post(s)
Liked 2,488 Times in 1,443 Posts
Originally Posted by nlerner
Uh, I'm not a mathematician, but I'll guess that depends on one's pay rate!
Good point. I found a census report of family income in 1952. Based on the distribution of income in the chart on page 1, median family income seems to be between $4,000 and $5,000. I assume this is gross income. Let's say to have $68.50 in hand, you had to earn $95.90. I'm assuming 40% of your money went to taxes, though that could be off. $4,500 gross annually works out to $86 per week, so it's more than a week's gross pay for a family earning the median income to buy that bike.

Today's median income is around $50,000, I think. A week's gross pay is 961. After 40% taxes (though it's really closer to 50% when you consider excise taxes, etc.), you have $686. Hmm, maybe bikes haven't gotten more expensive or cheaper. That's about the price for a bike that will last a lifetime.
__________________
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog

“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author

Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
noglider is offline