Old 10-14-15, 06:48 PM
  #75  
StanSeven
Administrator
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Delaware shore
Posts: 13,558

Bikes: Cervelo C5, Guru Photon, Waterford, Specialized CX

Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1106 Post(s)
Liked 2,179 Times in 1,469 Posts
Originally Posted by calimtb
Fascinating posts from dksix and hazet.

What's most telling however is rpen's original post. He is quite obviously underwhelmed. Now, the expenditure was hardly overwhelming ($500). However, given the bargain basement price, and incredibly low weight of the frame and fork, I would think he'd be thrilled with the price vs. performance ratio.

The fact that he isn't suggests that the amount of additional value offered by the highest end, lightest carbon frames (assuming his frame is comparable to an actual cervelo) compared to less expensive, slightly heavier frames is somewhere between marginal and non-existent.

Would a cervelo owner be willing to buy one of these workswell frames and compare?
Or the OPs new frame is priced that way because its nowhere close to the top end frames.

I'm not saying it is. But your suggestion without proof isn't valid.
StanSeven is offline