Old 10-20-15, 08:51 AM
  #71  
Stucky
Old Fart
 
Stucky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Bumpkinsville
Posts: 3,348

Bikes: '97 Klein Quantum '16 Gravity Knockout

Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 163 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by DaveWC
Standard business practice when valuing a business is to put a reasonable wage in under expenses for the labor of the owner. That way you get a true picture of how profitable the company is. In my previous example, if you remove the wage you end up with a cost of the bike of $2,150 plus 33% profit ($709.50) and a total cost of $2,859.50 for the bike. So you've reduced the cost of the bike, making it easier to sell and now you're paying yourself a wage of $500 (the assumption being that this is a reasonable wage to make a bike) and you're earning $209.50 profit. That's unreasonable payback for taking risk IMO. Either you're shortchanging yourself by placing 0 value on your time building the bike or you're earning far too little profit. As I said, you need to separate & place a value on your time & your risk.

But whatever, it's not going to happen. I guarantee you could easily end up with a million bucks with this company... but only if you started with about $5 million.
Yeah, with many small businesses, the owner is really just making a job for himself (as opposed to a business which can stand on it's own and generate a real profit). -A job with long hours and lots of headaches, for which they receive no compensation. But to many of us, it still beats working for someone else....
Stucky is offline