View Single Post
Old 10-29-15 | 01:07 PM
  #15  
badger1's Avatar
badger1
Senior Member
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 5,557
Likes: 1,827
From: Southwestern Ontario
I don't. I completely understand why some prefer not to use them (MUPs: "multi-use paths" or 'trails'), but provided one accepts the inevitable restrictions, what's not to like?

Ours (typical views):


Three main spokes following branches of the river, plus connector sections. Each main spoke constitutes roughly a 20km out 'n back; put them together with some connectors and one has a decent ride, and the ability to extend from any spoke-end onto decent rural roads.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
MUP 1.jpg (100.6 KB, 96 views)
File Type: jpg
MUP 2.jpg (105.5 KB, 94 views)
File Type: jpg
MUP 3.jpg (49.2 KB, 98 views)
File Type: jpg
MUP 4.jpg (100.8 KB, 95 views)
badger1 is offline  
Reply