View Single Post
Old 10-30-15, 08:10 AM
  #94  
ThermionicScott 
working on my sandal tan
 
ThermionicScott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Posts: 22,630

Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)

Mentioned: 98 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3871 Post(s)
Liked 2,571 Times in 1,579 Posts
Originally Posted by kbarch
This is what I don't understand. What is the advantage of such small increments? Surely not redundancy, but that's what it seems to approach. I've found that the increments around 7-7.5% are barely noticeable. I'd be inclined to call those useless if the alternative wasn't a single 15% jump, but even then, often enough I'll inadvertently skip over a gear and it won't matter, and there are plenty of times when it's necessary to make big jumps over two or more cogs.

In what circumstances do you most appreciate smaller steps? Flat stretches of a couple of miles or more? That's something I don't get much of....
They're nice on the top end, when you want to fine-tune your cadence at higher speeds. And I'm not going to lie, there is an aesthetic appeal to a tighter cassette without big cogs on it. But there is something to be said for only having gear increments that you will appreciate, so that is where this becomes individual again. Some people like and want single-tooth jumps down to 19T (or more), while others would rather make each shift count for more by that point. I'm somewhere in the middle. One cassette goes 13-14-15-16-17-19-21 and the other goes 13-14-15-17-19-21-24.
__________________
Originally Posted by chandltp
There's no such thing as too far.. just lack of time
Originally Posted by noglider
People in this forum are not typical.
RUSA #7498
ThermionicScott is offline