Old 11-15-15, 07:46 PM
  #197  
exmechanic89
Senior Member
 
exmechanic89's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Richmond VA area
Posts: 2,618

Bikes: '00 Koga Miyata Full Pro Oval Road bike.

Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 475 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times in 7 Posts
Originally Posted by Jeff Neese
Fully rigid chromoly is all that I have ridden, or will in the future.

My longtime main ride is a 1992 Trek 930 Singletrack, with significant upgrades. (Man, I love that bike!) The project I finished last winter and have been dialing in over the summer was built on a 1993 Rockhopper frame. That's a complete custom build and it turned out excellent.

I am of the opinion that the proliferation of suspensions was a marketing thing to promote bike sales. I don't disagree that suspensions are necessary for competition or trick riding, but c'mon. How often do most people go airborne (on purpose)? A rigid frame promotes good bike handling, and connects you to the road (conditions and feel) much better. And, I never have to ask how long my forks are going to last. (Forever.) I can go anywhere. There is never any concern "bombing down a hill" or taking a rough patch of downhill trail, at any speed.

Anyone that thinks they "need" a suspension may want to view this awesome video. It's fairly long - the first half is 100% urban riding, and in the second half they make it out of the city and into some serious off-road mountain biking, ending up literally at the top of a mountain. All on the same bikes, both of them rigid Trek Singletracks.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uyrlEE9AV58

Or check out this one of Danny MacAskill, on a rigid MTB.
https://youtu.be/Cj6ho1-G6tw
I agree with this post. Americans are such victims of marketing. I have nothing against suspension bikes but they're hardly a requirement to go off road.

My bikes are all rigids, too - all early 90's Treks in fact.
exmechanic89 is offline