Originally Posted by
PepeM
Never said anything like that, did I? Innocent or not, they are citizens and in most cases their crimes are not death penalty worthy and even if they were, they deserve a fair trial. That is, of course, ignoring the ones that have actually not done anything and been shot regardless.
I'm not a 'cop hater' but there are many issues with how the judicial system works in the US, and law enforcement is a big part of it.
So what you're saying is that those 1000 plus people were not innocent at all, starting to get a clearer image here of why you would bring this up, that in fact they were criminals in the act of doing a criminal activity, therefore cops should allow themselves to be shot first before they should shoot the criminal? Would that be fair for you?