Originally Posted by
cyccommute
I'm not sure what size backpack you've used but I would say that 45 l total volume is a whole lot even for carrying on my back. It's certainly enough to "carry the kitchen sink" as long as the sink is small(ish).
I've used external frames, internal frames, and frameless packs. When I started out more than 50 years ago external frames were everywhere. (I don't think internal frames had even been invented, yet, though I could be wrong.) I transitioned to frameless packs sometime in the mid to late 70s after seeing how much better they typically performed off-trail and, especially, after I took up cross-country skiing. As for frameless packs, I have only used a 20(?)-litre one as a day pack or for over-nighters. I've run into people on PCT going ultralight--under 15 pounds--it's not for me. I typically use one of my 35 to 50 litre packs, carrying about 20-25 pounds (pack, pad/bag/bivy/tarp or tent--too many different configurations to list, and a very few supplies) + food and water. Size really depends on how much food and water I have needed to pack and the season for extra clothes. (These are not big packs by backpacking standards:
How to Choose a Backpack - REI Expert Advice - REI Expert Advice) I did try a 70-litre military rucksack for winter camping once. (I hiked into the Deams Wilderness in the Hoosier National Forest for a week long trip where I had to pack all my food and winter gear.) That was a strain, so I switched to pulling a pulk for a few winter camps in the wilderness, though I'm too old for it now. In fact, I feel like I'm getting too old for hauling much of anything, on my back or through my hips, hence a bike!
BTW, glad to hear steep roads are not a problem in Colorado, maybe I'll push on to Utah and do some more gem prospecting! ;-)