I read your posts on this subject, and you 'appear' to be deliberately misinterpreting what's being said for the sake of starting sh**. That makes you a troll. NO ONE ELSE would have put forth the point that recognizing the success of cycling as a way of lie in regions that are less prosperous is equivalent to wanting that less-prosperous standard of living, RATHER than the focus on and acceptance of cycling.

We don't NEED to be poor and primitive to have a successful utility cycling culture, and if ANYTHING, the example of poorer economic societies making cycling work should demonstrate that we can not only "do it, too", but do it BETTER.