Originally Posted by
CrippledKonaBoy
I read your posts on this subject, and you 'appear' to be deliberately misinterpreting what's being said for the sake of starting sh**. That makes you a troll. NO ONE ELSE would have put forth the point that recognizing the success of cycling as a way of lie in regions that are less prosperous is equivalent to wanting that less-prosperous standard of living, RATHER than the focus on and acceptance of cycling.
We don't NEED to be poor and primitive to have a successful utility cycling culture, and if ANYTHING, the example of poorer economic societies making cycling work should demonstrate that we can not only "do it, too", but do it BETTER.
Given that neither Daniel4's post nor anybody else's provided any evidence of a "successful utility cycling culture" in African villages but rather bemoaned the introduction of automobiles to some African villages, my question for him is still relevant and on topic: What do primitive African villages have to do with advocacy much less a
glimpse of the future for anyone who reads this forum. It is neither here nor there whether anyone else questioned the logic in Daniel4's post or its lack of relevance to the thread topic, or that someone else thinks videos of NL cycling are a relevant answer to my question based on Daniel4's African village post.