View Single Post
Old 01-30-16, 07:13 AM
  #10  
bradtx
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Pearland, Texas
Posts: 7,579

Bikes: Cannondale, Trek, Raleigh, Santana

Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 308 Post(s)
Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Squeezebox, Generally wider is better, but not necessarily meaning a fat tired bike.

I had some 35 mm Panaracer Crosstowns on my touring bike and they were almost too wide to fit between the chainstays. They handled even ungroomed trails very well. On a different touring bike, but with the same frame, I have 37 mm Continentals that are much more narrow. Not quite as good on ungroomed trails nor would I expect them to do very well in loose sand. The bike that had the Crosstowns now has 32 mm Continentals and they're quite adequate for groomed trails.

A '90s era fully rigid mountain bike converted to a touring bike would be a very good choice regardless of the road surface you plan to tour on, even more so if you plan to ride the R2T routes.

Brad
bradtx is offline