Old 02-01-16, 02:40 PM
  #71  
CliffordK
Senior Member
 
CliffordK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Eugene, Oregon, USA
Posts: 27,547
Mentioned: 217 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18379 Post(s)
Liked 4,512 Times in 3,354 Posts
Originally Posted by Dan333SP
I have no respect for current or former doper of any variety, but I get your point.

I think people are more willing to give EPO/whatever biological dopers a pass after they've served their bans because they assume everyone else is doing it too, and they're still pushing the pedals after training their butts off.

This is just so much more blatant because it's literally powering the bike with a battery rather than just some doped-out legs.

I'm not saying the penalty should be any more harsh than what an EPO user gets, but it does "feel" more unfair than bio-doping. Unfortunately we're all super-desensitized to biodoping positive results now, and so many people have come back from suspensions and picked up where they left off, but this motor thing is entirely new territory.
One of the differences, of course, is that the strengthening effects of EPO, HGH, or steroid doping may well outlast the bans.

Pull the plug to the motor and the person may actually be worse off than if they hadn't used the the motor (lack of training).
CliffordK is online now