Originally Posted by
CliffordK
That is odd.... But, I think you're right.
So, there really wouldn't be a true "yield". Rather just go straight ahead balls-out, then cut over when convenient. Is it mislabelled? I assume there isn't a merge sign, just yield signs.
There are a few places that those +1 lanes are very nice.
One could extend the bike lane on both sides of the +1 lane for a short distance to give the cyclist more crossing choices, although I think cutting across as quickly as possible in a fixed location is better.
There is an
"added lane sign" - MUTCD W4-3.
This intersection is clearly just so WAY too confusing so it's *COMPLETELY* understandable that a motorist couldn't figure out how to successfully navigate it - it's the CONFUSING INTERSECTION'S FAULT.
-mr. bill