View Single Post
Old 02-09-16 | 06:41 AM
  #43  
bikemig's Avatar
bikemig
Senior Member
Titanium Club Membership
10 Anniversary
Community Builder
Community Influencer
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 21,785
Likes: 5,706
From: Middle Earth (aka IA)

Bikes: A bunch of old bikes and a few new ones

Originally Posted by CliffordK
So, for MTBs, is the problem the shift from level top tubes to sloping top tubes?

I suppose it shouldn't make a big difference, but for something like a touring/trekking bike, the level top tubes may be preferable.

It would be easy to mistake my "MTB" commuter for a road bike

That's a fine looking bike; what is it?

I don't know if the shift from level to sloping tubes makes much of a difference in terms of a bike's utility as an all rounder. I like sloping top tube. MTBs just evolved in terms of the geometry and equipment and became better for their intended use offroad. Vintage mtbs without a suspension fork are just fine all rounders. When posters come into the C&V valuation forum looking for a commuter, we always suggest a vintage mtb because of price and functionality.

When vintage road bikes took off in terms of price, that craze just didn't hit the mtbs. I'm not sure why. There are a lot more of them out there which may be part of the reason. That isn't true for the ones from the early 80s which is probably part of the reason why they have gone up in price; the same would be true of the mtbs from custom makers. I have 3 high end production mtbs (a 1988 specialized stumpjumper comp, a 1991 specialized team stumpjumper, and a 1992 Trek 950) and I know none of them are worth much.

No one would ever confuse my Trek 950 for anything other than a mtb; here it is in its natural environment, :

Attached Images
File Type: jpg
Jan12015.jpg (102.8 KB, 17 views)
File Type: jpg
IMG_0519.jpg (106.4 KB, 25 views)
File Type: jpg
IMG_0514.jpg (104.6 KB, 29 views)

Last edited by bikemig; 02-09-16 at 06:48 AM.
bikemig is online now  
Reply