View Single Post
Old 02-17-16 | 12:18 AM
  #24  
CafeVelo's Avatar
CafeVelo
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 1,040
Likes: 1
From: Ohio

Bikes: S-Works Tarmac, Nashbar CX, Trek 2200 trainer bike, Salsa Casseroll commuter, old school FS MTB

Originally Posted by Fiery
Reading the geometry charts, here is how stack and reach compare:

- - - - - - - 54 - - - - 56 - -
CAAD 10 - 54.6/38.3 - 56.0/39.4
CAAD 12 - 55.1/38.7 - 56.7/39.3



So not only does a CAAD 12 in size 56 not fit like CAAD 10 size 54, it actually fits a little larger than a CAAD 10 56. You are way off in claiming that CAAD 12 56 = CAAD 10 54.
What measurement are you calling 54/56? The size sticker on my bike said 56, but it had a 57.5 effective top tube. There is an extra row on the chart called measured size (referring to the size sticker on the bike) that doesn't read inline with the rest of the measurements for a size. Cannondale geometry charts for caad8/10 and the last version of the evo are unnecessarily hard to read for that reason, IMO.

CafeVelo is offline  
Reply