As I observe the valuations and clean-up recommendations passed around on this forum, I am a bit baffled at how the C&V community frowns upon repainting and severely reduces the value and desirability of a bike that has been repainted. The prevailing opinion among C&Vers seems to be faded paint, scratches, chips and light surface oxidation are better preserved as "patina" rather than a refinish.

When you contrast this to older cars, it seems to be the opposite. Aside from an exotic collectible or someone going for a "rat" look, something like a 1967 Chevelle with a fresh paint job is more desirable than a car with paint that is faded, chipped and scratched.

So why the difference with our 2-wheelers? Why isn't a quality CycleArt paint and decal job on a Colnago Super viewed as more desirable than a Colnago Super with original paint that is worn, chipped, scratched, etc.?