Originally Posted by
Chrome Molly
At some point isn't multiple chain ring sized rear cogs more expensive and less durable than a couple easily replaced chain rings? I can't even envision needing a 50t cog on my fat bike in deep snow. My skinnier tire bikes would not go well into the places where 50t cogs are needed (and FD's work fine outside of those places) so I don't understand
To be honest there are times when I could use a bit more low end on my fat bike (I love in a mountainous region). It would be nice to have say a 45T in the back and be able to bump up the front from 28T to 30T. I think for a lot of people with fat bikes, a 26t with 10 or 11-42 would be the sweet spot but 26t means direct mount (often not an option) or granny (not the best chainline if doing a conversion, but tolerable. So have this would allow another group or people to go 1x. Personally I am happy with 28Tx42 for sport applications but I wouldn't want to adventure tour with that, I'd like something a little lower so there is certainly a market for more low end with 1x. That said I'd rather go with an internal hub for adventure touring but the derailleur drivetrains are so much cheaper...
__________________
1 Super Record bike, 1 Nuovo Record bike, 1 Pista, 1 Road, 1 Cyclocross/Allrounder, 1 MTB, 1 Touring, 1 Fixed gear