View Single Post
Old 03-04-16 | 03:33 PM
  #19  
chasm54
Banned.
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 8,651
Likes: 3
From: Uncertain
Originally Posted by Drew Eckhardt
Chris Carmichael's zone system may be more attractive because it's based on the best of two all-out eight minute efforts which require less experience to pace well and is easier to accommodate logistically.

You can also use a polarized system, where efforts are either below your aerobic threshold (AeT, VT1) or above you anaerobic threshold (Ant, VT2, lactate threshold).

Your aerobic threshold is where breathing becomes rhythmic, conversation doesn't flow, lactate accumulation begins. It's the highest sustainable pace on a 3-5 hour ride with an even split.

Your anaerobic threshold is your LTHR.

You ride below your aerobic threshold on easy sessions (4/5), and past your anaerobic threshold for the 1 in 5 hard sessions (ex: 7-10 minute intervals as hard as possible). You don't need to know how far past your lactate threshold you're going.

I like a polarized approach (or close to it, with a Friel Z4 ride replacing an easy day), finding that works at least as well as more Z3/Z4 for efforts through 20-30 minutes but better for longer rides.

With mass-start racing you'd also want shorter neuromuscular efforts.
Agree with all of that. Tempo rides are useful if one is time constrained, but I find that riding around VT1 most of the time and above VT2 some of the time, with relatively little time in the middle, works best for me. I'm old, of course...
chasm54 is offline  
Reply