View Single Post
Old 03-08-16 | 08:17 PM
  #25  
iab's Avatar
iab
Senior Member
Sheldon Brown Memorial - Registered
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 12,910
Likes: 5,470
From: NW Burbs, Chicago
Originally Posted by icepick_trotsky
So why does it seem like this sort of patent-related exclusivity didn't happen with other cycling technologies? What gives?
I'm no lawyer but I hold several patents. And what it really boils down to is how broad is your claim. The broader the claim, the more likely you can go after infringers. The broad claim of "a slant", versus a narrow claim like "a slant of 30 degrees". I can get around the latter claim by making it a slant of 35 degrees but I don't get around the former claim.

Currently Segway is suing some hoverboard manufacturers for infringement and if you read Segway's claim, it is pretty broad. Again, I'm no lawyer but I think Segway has a pretty good case.

So as time moves on with a technology, it is harder and harder to get a broad claim because it has already been done. So you make you claims more narrow which then are easier to get around.
iab is offline  
Reply