Originally Posted by
Mobile 155
Yes, I believe I know several, from the other forums like folders or utility even. But it has to be admitted this forum goes political or social just about as fast as A and S. The others you are talking about aren't concerned with Urber having bike racks. Living densly to save the planet or restricting expansion from over crowded city cores. And I agree the Nike slogan may be a more valid reason than any of the social political ones.
Those things you mention are about LCF. Ride-sharing is an option for living without a car, as is biking, so why wouldn't people discuss having ride-sharing with bike-racks in an LCF forum? Likewise, living densely makes it easier to bike for transportation and/or have an effective transit system, thus it is an LCF issue. The fact that it is good for the planet is a bonus, but why should those who favor dense living for LCF be restricted against discussing how it is also good in other ways? It's like you want to censor anyone who has reasons why the things they support are actually good beyond their own personal preferences. That is YOUR point of view, but not everyone has to share it. I've explained this many times but you insist on complaining when people assert common good beyond personal prerogative.
Driving and sprawl aren't good for the planet just because you choose to believe they are. There are objective limits to various forms of growth and technology.