View Single Post
Old 03-23-16 | 01:42 PM
  #29  
corrado33
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 4,094
Likes: 2
From: Bozeman

Bikes: 199? Landshark Roadshark, 198? Mondonico Diamond, 1987 Panasonic DX-5000, 1987 Bianchi Limited, Univega... Chrome..., 1989 Schwinn Woodlands, Motobecane USA Record, Raleigh Tokul 2

Originally Posted by Andy_K
So now a question: I assume that most people shift less with a setup like this (2x6 + friction) and just the wider gaps of the rear cogs would mean less shifting, but just how much less often do you (yes, you) shift with this kind of a setup as opposed to an indexed 2x11 kind of bike?
I've ridden a DT shifter bike a few times on some longer rides. I found myself shifting only very slightly less, and that was only because I had fewer gears, not because of the shifter location. When my legs tell me to shift, I shift. Then again, I had indexed DT shifters, so that made it a bit easier.
corrado33 is offline  
Reply