Thread: Why 650b
View Single Post
Old 03-30-16 | 04:35 PM
  #88  
noglider's Avatar
noglider
aka Tom Reingold
Titanium Club Membership
15 Anniversary
Community Builder
Community Influencer
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 43,974
Likes: 6,153
From: New York, NY, and High Falls, NY, USA

Bikes: 1962 Rudge Sports, 1971 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Raleigh Pro Track, 1974 Raleigh International, 1975 Viscount Fixie, 1982 McLean, 1996 Lemond (Ti), 2002 Burley Zydeco tandem

Originally Posted by Darth Lefty
Since you could successfully make a bicycle for any size of person above 7 years old, built around 20" wheels, and it would probably be lighter, the better question might be why are there larger sizes?
Good question. I'm not sure, but thinking outloud here (or really thinking while typing, and is that dangerous?), a larger wheel definitely absorbs bumps better, all things being equal. Moulton showed that a suspension system can compensate for that. I test rode one of those old bikes, and if I could close my eyes for a while, I suspect I could be convinced it was a large-wheel bike. What is the cost of suspension? Is it expensiver? Trickier to engineer? Or do old habits just die hard and refuse to accept the idea of adults riding small wheels except for special reasons such as needing to fold the bike?
__________________
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog

“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author

Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
noglider is offline  
Reply