Thread: Why 650b
View Single Post
Old 03-31-16 | 02:27 PM
  #100  
noglider's Avatar
noglider
aka Tom Reingold
Titanium Club Membership
15 Anniversary
Community Builder
Community Influencer
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 43,976
Likes: 6,160
From: New York, NY, and High Falls, NY, USA

Bikes: 1962 Rudge Sports, 1971 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Raleigh Pro Track, 1974 Raleigh International, 1975 Viscount Fixie, 1982 McLean, 1996 Lemond (Ti), 2002 Burley Zydeco tandem

[MENTION=339610]Darth Lefty[/MENTION], it's probably some random happenstance as to why 650b emerged above more likely sizes, and maybe there were some corporate wars over it. But it doesn't matter much. 584 is as good as 587 or 590 unless you are already invested in tires or rims in those sizes. I have nothing in any of those sizes (except for 590 on my three speed) so I'm not going into 650b any time soon. I plan to see if my 700c by 35mm tires work well on my Raleigh International. Probably.
__________________
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog

“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author

Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
noglider is offline  
Reply