View Single Post
Old 04-16-16 | 06:19 AM
  #20  
chaadster
Thread Killer
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 13,140
Likes: 2,162
From: Ann Arbor, MI

Bikes: 15 Kinesis Racelight 4S, 76 Motebecane Gran Jubilée, 17 Dedacciai Gladiatore2, 12 Breezer Venturi, 09 Dahon Mariner, 12 Mercier Nano, 95 DeKerf Team SL, 19 Tern Rally, 21 Breezer Doppler Cafe+, 19 T-Lab X3, 91 Serotta CII, 23 3T Strada

Originally Posted by njkayaker
The navigation stuff is hard. Especially in a device that is supposed to be cheapish, small, and last a long time. Garmin is a leader in navigation and it's hard for them to get it completely right on the cycling units.


The phones do better because they are much faster computers with much more memory. Routes on google/waze/etc are not even calculated on the device.
I don't get what any of that has to do with why they don't make the UI better in nav units. What's holding them back from getting better chips and more memory? My feeling is that they're just behind the curve. TomTom are on track with the 6100 model, but they just introduced it last year. Put a damn SIM card in these things, guys!
chaadster is offline  
Reply