Originally Posted by
grolby
Triples undeniably have advantages over the alternatives. But that doesn't matter. 1X and double cranks with wide-range cassettes have a different set of advantages, and many people seem to prefer the trade-offs they make. It's sort of like disruptive innovation in bike components - the new thing doesn't have to be better in every single way to be preferred by the market. Expecting that everyone should just learn how to deal with a triple chainring drivetrain is a non-starter. When you start talking about the virtues of putting together a totally non-standard, customized setup, it just gets ridiculous. I'm a massive bike nerd and I sure don't want to deal with that crap! People want to ride bikes, not take a continuing education course on managing their drivetrains. It's not a bad thing to accommodate that.
I can't see any "different set of advantages" that 1x and compact double cranks have for many outside of racing. If you know your course, a 1x system can be tuned to take the best advantage of it. But if you are just out riding and encountering very different terrains, the 1x systems fall flat on their face. Most of us don't ride a closed loop all the time and would do better with a multigear system with a wide range.
The customized system that I've presented aren't that difficult to put together nor are they that "ridiculous". They might require a little bit more work to put together then just using what comes out of the box but it's not that much effort and the results can be a lot better than the stock version. Do you always just take what is given to you? Never experiment to find out what is possible?
Frankly, when I see the shift pattern on compact doubles, I think it would take a continuing education course to figure out how to use them effectively. Most people would could grasp a cross-over system quite readily. Most people already shift their bikes that anyway.