View Single Post
Old 05-03-16 | 06:51 AM
  #4  
Geo_08
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 155
Likes: 1
From: St. Louis

Bikes: 1990 Diamondback Master TG, 2015 All City macho man disc, 2015 Trek X-caliber 7, 1989 concorde pdm team edition

Originally Posted by Darth Lefty
Let's take the SS for one example. The cog capacity numbers have to do with distance from the pulley to the cassette. At the top cog it can manage a 14T without running too close, and an 11 won't be too far away to shift well. At the bottom, it can manage a 28 without running too close, and a 25 won't be too far away to shift well. With 11-28, the rear takes up 17 teeth of wrap, leaving 33-17=16 teeth difference for the front, matching the 50-34 front rings.
That makes sense, and then I get the general idea for the GS as they are giving an example for running it with a triple, but:

Maximum Sprocket - Low sprocket: 34T / Top sprocket:12T (front double) / 20T Low sprocket: 32T / Top sprocket:12T(front triple)
Minimum Sprocket - Low sprocket: 28T / Top sprocket:11T (front double) / 20T Low sprocket: 25T / Top sprocket:11T(front triple)

In the above example, what does the 20T refer to?
Geo_08 is offline  
Reply