View Single Post
Old 05-08-16 | 08:35 PM
  #22  
PepeM's Avatar
PepeM
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2015
Posts: 6,861
Likes: 120
Originally Posted by Inpd
Yep, I meant to write 11/32 but it doesn't change the question.

39/53 and 11/32 is used because it offers some advantages. I got it on my Breezer after reading these threads and many others. The jist is that combination is great for people (like me) who live in flat areas and do a bit of climbing.

53/39 crank + 11/32 cassette? - Bike Forums
53/39 w 11-32 vs Compact 11-28 - Road Bike, Cycling Forums ...
Seems to me like it gives you a bunch of gear combinations you'll never use (four gear combinations that will give you 27+ mph at 90rpms) with only two gear options for the 18-23 mph range. On the other hand, you could probably spend 90% of your time on the small ring but even then, the spacing doesn't look all that great. But if it works for you then it is all good. As I said, rider dependent.
PepeM is offline  
Reply