View Single Post
Old 05-09-16 | 01:45 PM
  #34  
noglider's Avatar
noglider
aka Tom Reingold
Titanium Club Membership
15 Anniversary
Community Builder
Community Influencer
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 44,180
Likes: 6,415
From: New York, NY, and High Falls, NY, USA

Bikes: 1962 Rudge Sports, 1971 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Raleigh Pro Track, 1974 Raleigh International, 1975 Viscount Fixie, 1982 McLean, 1996 Lemond (Ti), 2002 Burley Zydeco tandem

Originally Posted by ItsJustMe
Percentage of collision direction is going to be EXTREMELY subject to local riding conditions.

On the route I ride, it would be almost impossible for someone to hit me from the front. I'm riding miles and miles down high speed roads with very rare driveways and intersections.

On routes in cities that involve a lot of pull-outs and left turns, I'd imagine that being hit from the front or being pulled out in front of would be much more common.

There's just no way that a single number can quantify risks for all cyclists. You could probably create a stat that indicated that 80% of all bicycle accidents were caused by protruding tree roots if you sampled the right cyclists.
Most traffic statistics are on a state or national level, and that would smooth out the problem of small sizes like the one you're speaking of. You make a valid point which is that a well sampled survey may not apply to an individual's situation, but statistics are useful anyway, especially if, over your lifetime, you are going to be riding in a variety of conditions. I bet most people won't do most of their cycling on divided highways.
__________________
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog

“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author

Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
noglider is offline  
Reply