View Single Post
Old 05-13-16 | 12:30 PM
  #19  
grolby's Avatar
grolby
Senior Member
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 9,878
Likes: 160
From: BOSTON BABY
Originally Posted by Salamandrine
LOL. Yeah, while I greatly admire the contributions of both those dudes, they are not infallible.
100% agree. As I've gotten older/more experienced, I've come to better understand that everyone really just has their own collection of preferences and experiences, and there's a context to evaluate their ideas in. One thing that really struck me about Petersen's book a few years back was how much of his perspective obviously comes from living in northern California, of all things. His clothing advice in particular. I still respect them both (RIP Sheldon), but it turns out I'm a different sort of bike rider than either one. That said, some of what Petersen says about handlebars really gets my goat because he's guilty of disseminating claims about handlebar height, reach and shoulder anatomy that are completely the reverse of reality. To the point of distributing deeply misleading diagrams and everything. But I'm trying to avoid that rant, it's not really relevant.

Originally Posted by Salamandrine
I haven't raced or for that matter ridden long miles every day regularly since I was a teenager, but back then I honestly don't remember my rear being sore, despite ~400 miles/week and 3-4" drop. Sore legs, yes, that was continual...

AFA the B17 not being for dropped position, I think you are correct that it is somewhat of a modern myth, but still IME there's some truth to it.
Oh sure, I'm not saying it's wrong to say the B17 works well for bars above the saddle, I just doubt it was intentionally designed for that.
grolby is offline  
Reply