Originally Posted by
rydabent
Every advancement have their nay sayers. It boils down to money. Im sure that the wheel mfg are behind the push to ban disc brakes. If a bike has disc brakes, they wont wear out the rims, it is that simple.
The nay sayers alway seems to be against any advancement. I am easily old enough to remember when click shifting came out in the 80s. The nay sayers then said it was unnecessary and that any "good" cyclist doesnt need such a contraption.
And of course it goes further back than that when the old fools of the UCI took money under the table to declare that a recumbent bicycle wasnt actually a bicycle.
The bottom line here is the fact that a rim that doesnt need a brake strip can be made lighter stronger and more aerodynamic. And of course the big plus is the fact the rim doesnt get worn out by the rim brake shoes.
Always?
If I had a CHOICE, I would choose thumb shifters over trigger shifters any day of the week on an mtb. Guess what? We were not given a choice. Thumb shifters are lighter, and give you a choice of friction vs indexing. The light weight, versatility and brilliant functionality make them clearly superior, but the manufacturers forced trigger shifters down our throats so here we are.
Some CHANGES in tech suck, others are absolutely fantastic. Let's take examples one by one; blanket generalizations are just dumb.