Old 05-18-16, 11:31 AM
  #124  
CafeVelo
Senior Member
 
CafeVelo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,040

Bikes: S-Works Tarmac, Nashbar CX, Trek 2200 trainer bike, Salsa Casseroll commuter, old school FS MTB

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 31 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by Stratocaster
My original post suggests heavier "feels" better to ME. Again, the advantage is that I like riding a bike that has a weightier feel without being a complete beast of a bike.

The training/racing aspect is interesting though, as I've heard/read that sprinters (runners) practice running down hill so that their muscles know what it feels like to move faster.
I imagine it's the same with cycling. So I would say in that context lighter is "better".
I've got racing bikes that range from 16-22lb, the lightest being carbon and the heaviest being steel. I like the light bike more, but it's more about frame stiffness than anything else. That said I don't intend to buy a bike heavier than 16-17 lb from now on. My next bike is probably going to be a stainless steel custom job, built weight weenie to match my carbon bike's weight.
CafeVelo is offline