View Single Post
Old 05-19-16 | 08:34 AM
  #4  
Tourist in MSN
Senior Member
15 Anniversary
Community Builder
Active Streak: 30 Days
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 12,730
Likes: 2,106
From: Madison, WI

Bikes: 1961 Ideor, 1966 Perfekt 3 Speed AB Hub, 1994 Bridgestone MB-6, 2006 Airnimal Joey, 2009 Thorn Sherpa, 2013 Thorn Nomad MkII, 2015 VO Pass Hunter, 2017 Lynskey Backroad, 2017 Raleigh Gran Prix, 1980s Bianchi Mixte on a trainer. Others are now gone.

Several bike computer companies have tire circumference data that is generic, not tire model specific. In this chart, the L column is the circumference, presumably L means length of distance for one revolution.
http://www.cateye.com/data/resources..._chart_ENG.pdf

A smooth tire that is good for pavement might be smaller circumference than one with more tread. And of course the knobby ones would be bigger yet, so the table is very generic.

Take the circumference value, divide by pi (3.14159) to get diameter (or height). Then divide by 2 to get radius. Radius would be the distance from the axle to the tire tread, thus that is the number you want.

I am not endorsing Cateye chart, I did a quick google search, that was the first chart I found. I use different brands of computers.
Tourist in MSN is offline  
Reply