Originally Posted by
prathmann
If anything, the policy makes that worker less safe rather than more safe. If your hypothetical crack head with no initial sinister intent walks up to the window and gets respectfully served by the staff then he's most likely to go on his way and no one gets hurt. OTOH, with the current policy that same crack head still walks up to the window but is told 'Sorry, we don't serve your kind - get lost.' That would seem to make the chance for an angry confrontation and possible injury much greater than if he had simply been handed the Big Mac he ordered.
If worker safety were the issue, then it should be provided by improved physical security in the window design. But the current policy does nothing to keep potential criminals away from the window nor does it protect the workers from them. The only effect it has is to turn away legitimate customers who just want to receive the food they ordered and are willing to pay for.
You're exaggerating now..."we don't serve *your kind*"...really? Is that what cyclists or pedestrians are told during daylight/business hours when they present at the window? No, probably something like, "customers in cars only are served at this window".
The window design is secure in that *it doesn't have to be opened* when a pedestrian or cyclist presents himself, regardless or state of inebriation or time of day.
The policy has merit in terms of worker, and even "walk-up" customers safety IMO. If yours differs, that's fine.