Originally Posted by
Lazyass
Nobody here has seen his medical records.
True. So stating that he was sliced by a disc (or not) as FACT would be wrong.
Originally Posted by
Lazyass
But the UCI banned discs in response to his injury and after meeting with cycling teams who did not want them.
FACT.
Originally Posted by
Lazyass
Some of you have serious reading comprehension issues. If it was actually caused by a disc or not is something the rest of you can cat fight about.
Grow up.
Originally Posted by
Lazyass
But when the UCI met with the cycling industry companies they said they would round off the rotors and maybe cover them.
Allegedly.
Originally Posted by
Lazyass
Now why would they have to do that if they aren't injuring anyone?
Seems like a sensible thing to do, regardless of whether anyone has been injured or not. Wouldn't you agree?