Originally Posted by
rekmeyata
Your second paragraph made no sense whatsoever, you were just rambling nonsense.
It made no sense to you because it's where the actual reason was, something you are incapable of in regards to this topic apparently.
Paved surfaces benefit everyone, just as cop service benefits everyone. Not every cop benefits everyone and not every paved surface benefits everyone. There is no difference except that you want there to try to draw the divisions that way in your mind.
You want to draw the line by the "kind" of service you use defined in the way you wan to define "kind". But that's just your arbitrary way of thinking and you're too narrowly focussed to see it. We can defind a "kind" of service any way we want. In the end we all benefit a certain fraction of total services and the best we can do is hope that's pretty balanced, or switch to 100% pay per use. The balance of payment vs benefit received for cyclists is very fair, and the rest is just games you want to play with words and pseudo logic.