Originally Posted by
CB HI
The intention of the law is a parallel path within 450 feet to the road that is off limits. Black Hawk has not met this intent, regardless of how they would like to twist things.
What will save the city is that another law suit is not worth the effort compared to just cycling the less than legal alternate path.
The intent of the law may be a parallel path but the wording is squishy enough that Black Hawk might win another legal challenge. The danger there is that other cities would be free to use the same interpretation which isn't a precedent I would like to see set in Colorado.