Originally Posted by
rpenmanparker
If my score had been 491, I would not be shooting T.
That's what I wanted to hear because these hormone doctors are quite misleading where they manipulate the numbers and get you thinking that a 491 is actually low. There's one chart that says I have the same level as an 80 year old man, and should be in the 900-1,200 range for optimal results. My post was more about curiosity and confirmation that I didn't need to explore that option as of yet. I don't think I'd be against it in the future if needed but believe I'm at an okay level for now.