Originally Posted by
rekmeyata
I read this, and at that point I decided the rest of what you were going to say was going to be as moronic as that statement. That's like saying, let's remove the wings on an airplane, sure it won't allow the plane to fly but it would generate spending, job growth, and tax money.
No, it looks more like he is praising the Chinese system, where buildings are only expected to last twenty years, and are typically torn down before that. Simply building poorly keeps a lot of people employed in the constrcution sector.