View Single Post
Old 07-12-16 | 08:38 PM
  #5  
ThermionicScott's Avatar
ThermionicScott
Senior Member
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 22,676
Likes: 2,642
From: CID

Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)

Originally Posted by SpeshulEd
Also, why change the big ring if you're keeping the small ring the same? Just drop down to the 34 for the steeper hills, keep the 50 for descending.
Just speaking for myself, if the only cassette options are 11-X and 12-X, big rings like 50 and 53 create top gears that I'm never going to use. Why waste room on the rear axle with cogs that never get touched? Shrinking the big ring makes the whole cassette more usable, and allows me to stay in the big ring longer before dropping to the small ring.
ThermionicScott is offline  
Reply