View Single Post
Old 07-12-16 | 08:58 PM
  #7  
alcjphil's Avatar
alcjphil
Senior Member
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 6,655
Likes: 2,252
From: Montreal, Quebec
Originally Posted by ThermionicScott
Just speaking for myself, if the only cassette options are 11-X and 12-X, big rings like 50 and 53 create top gears that I'm never going to use. Why waste room on the rear axle with cogs that never get touched? Shrinking the big ring makes the whole cassette more usable, and allows me to stay in the big ring longer before dropping to the small ring.
That is a very good point, but the OP was asking about better gearing for climbing, Changing the big ring may not address that problem
alcjphil is offline  
Reply